![]() |
|
|
|
Taught Elective: Website EvaluationMAPS Taught Elective: Website Evaluation Assignment Helen Williams MAPS y2. 31st January 2007 Site
Evaluation You
are asked to choose a website, possibly in keeping within your own interests or
area of research. Once this decision has been made you are then asked to
consider the following. 1.
What
is the site for, what information is to be communicated? What, in your opinion,
is the author trying to achieve? The
site is designed to be the shop window for landscape photographer Harry Cory
Wright and his company, Saltwater. It gives information about the person, the
gallery venue, and the work produced. It appears that the author is aiming to
provide a source of both straight information (maps, places to eat and so on) as
well as aesthetically pleasing images for us to look at and admire. The site is,
therefore, a showcase for Cory Wright’s photographic expertise and a vehicle
for promotion of his core business. 2.
At
whom is the site aimed? What is the target audience for the site? Fellow
photographers (amateur and pro) prospective purchasers of fine art photography
and people who enjoy looking without buying. 3.
What
is the interactive experience? How easy is to navigate through the site? How is
the information structured? How quickly does it load, are you left waiting for
sections to load? The simple, uncluttered homepage offers us a promise of
what can be found inside through the use of a typical Cory Wright image and
little else: There
is a hierarchy of information, with the links divided into a menu of three items
and submenu of a further two. There is no indication as to a preferred route
through the site. If the obvious first link - Gallery - is followed then we arrive at a page which is sparsely populated with text but dominated by a large photograph of an interior: We
are not told where the shot is taken but, as it is a departure from the
landscape images we are expecting, it could be inferred that this is an image of
personal significance to the site owner; perhaps an interior shot from his own
house, or at least his ideal house. It gives us a nice, cuddly feeling which is
somewhat at odds with Cory Wright’s usual outdoor images. For those who know
his oeuvre, this has a destabilizing effect, which could be quite intentional of
course. The
text on this page is small and could be somewhat difficult to read on anything
less than an XGA display. (It is also repeated needlessly elsewhere.) It makes
reference to the site owner’s background, his activities, his oeuvre and his
current business, none of which bears any relation to the cosy-hearth image over
which it uncomfortably hovers. From
this point the viewer is led towards a link to View Photographs, making it less
likely to return to the main menu in the top right hand corner (where,
incidentally, the Photographs link is repeated, but links from the sub menu on
the homepage have disappeared – will we remember to go back there to see what
they were?) Navigation around the site has now become serendipitous rather than
didactic. If
the Photographs link is followed, we arrive at a list of photographic galleries
listed in plain text which, whilst loading quickly without the hindrance of
graphics, does nothing to help us choose which of the image collections to visit
next. Small thumbnails which were indicative of the pages to come would have
helped inform the viewer’s navigation route and, in this day and age, would
have done little to slow down the loading speed of the page.
From
this list it is a straightforward matter to follow the text hyperlinks and, from
any given gallery, navigate back to the Photographs index.
The
Gallery pages have a neutral grey background which, whilst inoffensive, does not
give the site the air of sophistication which might be felt if either black or
pure white had been used. The thumbnails hotlink to larger versions of the
images in the usual way, most of which are a sensible 300-400px wide. A second
click takes the viewer to a much larger 600px wide version. All images are
copyable and downloadable and therefore easy to appropriate. Elsewhere
there is a helpful information page which provides all the usual contact and
location details, including an email hotlink, but the two clickable maps are not
credited to the copyright holder. An embedded link to Googlemaps might have been
a better alternative as it allows the user to go further in route planning and
understanding the location of the venue. If
ever the viewer remembers to go back to the homepage, there are two further
links in the sub menu which go to a book promotion and some downloadable desktop
wallpaper images. Overall
the site loads quickly on my fast machine with broadband connection. The images
are sensibly sized so there should be reasonable access on a dial-up, if not for
the largest images then certainly for everything else. See above for comments on the introductory text. Elsewhere
on the site images are placed alongside text to add interest but have no direct
relevance: 5.
What
media, if any, has been used? Photographic
images, php contact submission form, text. No Flash or movies. 6.
What devices are used to trigger links? Text
hyperlinks. 7.
Finally
draw out the site structure, using a site map, showing the pages and all the
links connecting these pages. Using web
authoring software, this sitemap has been reconstructed from my navigations
around the original site: URLs Evaluating
Web Pages: The
Good, The Bad & The Ugly: Cornell University Library: five criteria for evaluating websites Webcredible: usability website evaluation Bowen Craggs and Co evaluation of a site Richard Seah Effective Websites
|
|
(C) Helen Williams 2007 |